Comments on: New Information on “FTL Neutrinos” http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/02/23/new-information-on-ftl-neutrinos/ Thoughts on work and life from particle physicists from around the world. Thu, 16 May 2013 16:14:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Xezlec http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/02/23/new-information-on-ftl-neutrinos/#comment-54319 Xezlec Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:00:56 +0000 http://www.quantumdiaries.org/?p=20383#comment-54319 See what I mean?

]]> By: Xezlec http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/02/23/new-information-on-ftl-neutrinos/#comment-54116 Xezlec Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:44:13 +0000 http://www.quantumdiaries.org/?p=20383#comment-54116 I love seeing a consistently sober voice somewhere. It’s a nice antidote to the rest of the internet.

]]> By: Uncle Al http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/02/23/new-information-on-ftl-neutrinos/#comment-54080 Uncle Al Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:45:39 +0000 http://www.quantumdiaries.org/?p=20383#comment-54080 Euclid is rigorous but not sacred. Non-Euclidean geometries have richer postulates. Euclid is violated but not contradicted. Contradicting relativity is a bad thing. Sloppy connections happen. Correction and notification are ethical and laudable. However, theorists abundantly “proved” the absurd, on arXiv. Theory needs pruning.

To criticize is to volunteer.

Relativity is rigorous but not sacred. Einstein-Cartan-Kibble-Sciama gravitation ignores the Equivalence Principle. EP = true is relativity. EP = false has testable EP violations. One ECKS emergent observable is newly interactive: physical chirality. Relativity has no defense – violation without contradiction.

Crystallography illuminates. Chemically and macroscopically identical single crystals in enantiomorphic space groups are EP-violations: gamma-Glycine [space groups P3(1) versus P3(2)] or alpha-quartz [space groups P3(1)21 versus P3(2)21]. Good observation prunes theory. What fun there could be within 70-year old classical theory! Somebody should look.

]]> By: Javier http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/02/23/new-information-on-ftl-neutrinos/#comment-54073 Javier Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:45:11 +0000 http://www.quantumdiaries.org/?p=20383#comment-54073 “Of course, we already knew with incredible confidence that the OPERA result is wrong”

Yes, you seem to be a BIG scientific.

‘Of course’.

Please, detach your Ethernet wire from your PC, and after, over 3 years, over 15.000 times, try to connect to a web that test your link speed.

“Of course”, your PC, with the Ethernet wire in your hand, “Would connect”.

And “Of course”, this ‘stupid and wrong methodology”, would give you a speed rate of 60 nanoseconds, ALWAYS over the speed you have signed with your Internet Provider.

And After, please, go to your University, and say this, to your students.

And suspend those students that do not accept your BIG scientific explanation.

“Of Course”.

Javier.
Madrid.
Spain.

(The west world is going just to the hole with so many stupid).

Best Regards

]]> By: Gavin Wince http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/02/23/new-information-on-ftl-neutrinos/#comment-54070 Gavin Wince Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:46:48 +0000 http://www.quantumdiaries.org/?p=20383#comment-54070 This is history repeating itself: physicist panicking over data not fitting within acceptable theory standard. First indicator that a paradigm shift is building tension.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awwOtEk7hQ0&sns=em

]]>