<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The travelling garden gnome, an instrument of science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/04/13/the-travelling-garden-gnome-an-instrument-of-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/04/13/the-travelling-garden-gnome-an-instrument-of-science/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on work and life from particle physicists from around the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:34:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignacio Fernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/04/13/the-travelling-garden-gnome-an-instrument-of-science/#comment-65760</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignacio Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantumdiaries.org/?p=21757#comment-65760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Al</title>
		<link>http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2012/04/13/the-travelling-garden-gnome-an-instrument-of-science/#comment-64306</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantumdiaries.org/?p=21757#comment-64306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Measure the SI weight (not mass) of an average apple.  Amazing.

&lt;I&gt;Kern the Gnome... visited SNOLAB... located 2 km underground, where he weighed less than on the surface because of the 2 km of rocks above him while there was less of the Earth attracting him below.&lt;/I&gt;  &lt;B&gt;Probably not&lt;/B&gt;

http://www.typnet.net/Essays/EarthGrav.htm
 (bottom graph)  Gee &lt;I&gt;increases&lt;/I&gt; with depth to 50% Earth&#039;s radius given its Mars-sized dense iron core. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EarthGravityPREM.jpg

Kern the Gnome displaces a constant volume of air, density (hence buoyancy) proportional to pressure and inversely to absolute temperature - possibly 8% of weight change South Pole (warmed hut) versus Equator (air-conditioned room) for air pressure, hence SNOLAB.  The Kern Gnome Team knows about buoyancy.  A Kern II might be near-net reaction-bonded TaC_0.55, density ~15 g/cm^3, minimizing diamagnetic buoyancy too, 

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650005933_1965005933.pdf
   Magnetic susceptibility versus composition.  TaC_0.55 and TaC_0.9 (less dense) snug zero re Earth&#039;s magnetic field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Measure the SI weight (not mass) of an average apple.  Amazing.</p>
<p><i>Kern the Gnome&#8230; visited SNOLAB&#8230; located 2 km underground, where he weighed less than on the surface because of the 2 km of rocks above him while there was less of the Earth attracting him below.</i>  <b>Probably not</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.typnet.net/Essays/EarthGrav.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.typnet.net/Essays/EarthGrav.htm</a><br />
 (bottom graph)  Gee <i>increases</i> with depth to 50% Earth&#8217;s radius given its Mars-sized dense iron core.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EarthGravityPREM.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EarthGravityPREM.jpg</a></p>
<p>Kern the Gnome displaces a constant volume of air, density (hence buoyancy) proportional to pressure and inversely to absolute temperature &#8211; possibly 8% of weight change South Pole (warmed hut) versus Equator (air-conditioned room) for air pressure, hence SNOLAB.  The Kern Gnome Team knows about buoyancy.  A Kern II might be near-net reaction-bonded TaC_0.55, density ~15 g/cm^3, minimizing diamagnetic buoyancy too, </p>
<p><a href="http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650005933_1965005933.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650005933_1965005933.pdf</a><br />
   Magnetic susceptibility versus composition.  TaC_0.55 and TaC_0.9 (less dense) snug zero re Earth&#8217;s magnetic field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
