• John
  • Felde
  • University of Maryland
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • James
  • Doherty
  • Open University
  • United Kingdom

Latest Posts

  • Andrea
  • Signori
  • Nikhef
  • Netherlands

Latest Posts

  • CERN
  • Geneva
  • Switzerland

Latest Posts

  • Aidan
  • Randle-Conde
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Belgium

Latest Posts

  • Richard
  • Ruiz
  • Univ. of Pittsburgh
  • U.S.A.

Latest Posts

  • Laura
  • Gladstone
  • University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Seth
  • Zenz
  • Imperial College London
  • UK

Latest Posts

  • Michael
  • DuVernois
  • Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Emily
  • Thompson
  • Switzerland

Latest Posts

  • Ken
  • Bloom
  • USA

Latest Posts

CERN | Geneva | Switzerland

View Blog | Read Bio

Huge impact from a tiny decay

The Hadron Collider Physics Symposium opened on November 12 in Kyoto on a grand note. For the first time, the LHCb collaboration operating at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN showed evidence for an extremely rare type of events, namely the decay of a Bs meson into a pair of muons (a particle very similar to the electron but 200 times heavier). A meson is a composite class of particles formed from a quark and an antiquark. The Bs meson is made of a bottom quark b and a strange quark s. This particle is very unstable and decays in about a picosecond (a millionth of a millionth of a second) into lighter particles.

Decays into two muons are predicted by the theory, the Standard Model of particle physics, that states it should occur only about 3 times in a billionth of decays. In scientific notation, we write (3.54±0.30)x10-9 where the value of 0.30 represents the error margin on this theoretical calculation. Now, the LHCb collaboration proudly announced that they observed it at a rate of (3.2+1.5-1.2)x10-9 , a value very close to the theoretically predicted value, at least within the experimental error.

Here is the plot shown by the LHCb collaboration for the number of events found in data as a function of the combined mass of the two muons. The solid blue line represents the sum of all types of events from known phenomena containing two muons. The dashed curve in red shows the number of events coming from a Bs meson. With the current error margin on the measurement (shown by the

vertical and horizontal bars on the data points), the data seem to agree with all expected contributions from known sources, leaving little room for new phenomena.

This represents a great achievement, not only because this is the rarest process ever observed, but because it puts stringent limits on new theories. Here is why.

Theorists are convinced that a theory far more encompassing than the Standard Model exists even though we have not detected its presence yet. As if the Standard Model is to particle physics what the four basic operations (addition, multiplication, division and subtraction) are to mathematics. They are sufficient to tackle daily problems but one needs algebra, geometry and calculus to solve more complex problems. And in particle physics, we do have problems we cannot solve with the Standard Model, such as explaining the nature of dark matter and dark energy.

A good place to catch the first signs of “new physics” is where the Standard Model predicts very faint signals such as in Bs mesons decaying into two muons. These decays occur extremely rarely because the Standard Model only has limited ways to produce them. But if an additional mechanism comes into play due to some new theory, we would observe these decays at a rate different from what is expected within the Standard Model.

This is a bit like using the surface of a lake to detect the presence of an invisible creature, hoping its breath would create a ripple on the water surface. It would only work if the lake were extremely calm or disturbed only by an occasional tiny fish.  Here the Standard Model acts like all known little animals creating ripples on the water surface.  The hope was to detect other ripples in the absence of known causes (fish, frogs or mosquitoes). The LHCb result reveals no extra ripples yet. So either the new creature does not breathe as expected or we need to find another method to see it. It will be easier to know once the error margin is reduced with more data.

This new result pushes the reach for new physics even further. Nevertheless, it will help theorists eliminate faulty models like on the plot below and eventually zoom on the right solution. Meanwhile, experimentalists will have to devise yet more stringent tests to be able to discover the way to this new physics.

This plot shows how this measurement (horizontal axis) shown earlier this year reduced the space where new physics could be seen. With this new result, the constraints will even be stronger.

(For more details, see LHCb website)

Pauline Gagnon

To be alerted of new postings, follow me on Twitter: @GagnonPauline or sign-up on this mailing list to receive and e-mail notification.


Tags: , ,

  • http://facebook m lyttle,

    hi everyone at cern, black holes, is it accptable a theory that they produce mass and matter, since they are in themselves particle accelorators, and also dark matter, is this possibly gyroscopic energy, or simple magnetic force produced by the gravity of planets in the universe. how long away are we from finding if we live in a universe that lives beside nieghbouring universes

  • http://www.cern.ch CERN

    Hello, a particle accelerator does not create energy or matter out of nothing. If you are not convinced, take a look at CERN electricity bill! The energy put out by the accelerator, the LHC, comes from something else. All the LHC does is to allow concentrating this energy in one tiny spot, and then this energy can materialize in the shape of new particles. Lavoisier’s principle still holds: “Nothing is created, nothing is lost, everything is transformed”. In this sense, you are right, a black hole is also a particle accelerator. The extremely large gravitational fields it generates can accelerate particles and when they will collide with each other, form new particles. So it is just a transformation of gravitational energy into matter, not the creation of matter out of nothing.

    Now, if I or anybody else knew the answer to your second question about dark matter, we would stop wondering about the nature of dark matter and dark energy. As far as I understand it, the presence of dark matter means the gravitational fields are much larger than if there was only ordinary matter 9the part that we see, stars and galaxies). This gives extra gyroscopic or rotational energy to the ordinary matter, which is in fact, how the presence of dark matter was discovered. So I think it works in the other direction. I hope this helps you a bit. Of course, if we knew what dark matter is I could provide a much better answer…

    Cheers, Pauline

  • Marcel van Velzen

    Dear Pauline,

    Great article as usual.

    What an astonishing accomplishment by CERN and especially the LHCb team.
    I personally believe that this experimental confirmation of the Standard Model prediction of the tiny Bs branching ratio to two muons is as important as the discovery of the HIggs particle.


  • http://www.cern.ch CERN

    Glad you liked the article, Marcel.
    Indeed, this is a major accomplishment. Theorists like Nazila Mahmoudi are convinced that this new result will help open new doors contrary to what has been said in some places (i.e. interpreting this result as the end of supersymmetry). I am hoping to have a discussion with her next week and report on her thoughts for the next steps and the implication of this results in a week or two. It might take time but something new will show up. The resilience of the Standard Model is also telling us something (not quite sure yet what it is though).

    Cheers, Pauline

  • Pablo

    Congrats for the article, quite nice one!
    I was missing some flavour physics besides so much Higgs! :P

  • http://www.cern.ch CERN

    Glad you liked it and thanks for letting me know. Indeed, there is more to CERN than just the Higgs but that one has been the most popular in the media. I am always happy to cover other topics and this one from LHCb was hard to pass by… Such an important and far reaching measurement. I’ll make sure to keep a balance, thanks for the reminder.

    Cheers, Pauline

  • Pingback: LHC está matando a supersimetria - Noticias em tempo real()

  • http://east-site.com Here

    Interesting article cern, and great results. It’s like I’m back to quantum mechanics class in the university. You guys are so lucky to have a chance to work in this team. Whereas in our country the physics is neither dead or alive ;)