• John
  • Felde
  • University of Maryland
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • USLHC
  • USLHC
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Flip
  • Tanedo
  • USLHC
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • CERN
  • Geneva
  • Switzerland

Latest Posts

  • Aidan
  • Randle-Conde
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Belgium

Latest Posts

  • Laura
  • Gladstone
  • University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Richard
  • Ruiz
  • Univ. of Pittsburgh
  • U.S.A.

Latest Posts

  • Seth
  • Zenz
  • Imperial College London
  • UK

Latest Posts

  • Michael
  • DuVernois
  • Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Jim
  • Rohlf
  • USLHC
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Emily
  • Thompson
  • USLHC
  • Switzerland

Latest Posts

  • Ken
  • Bloom
  • USLHC
  • USA

Latest Posts

Fermilab | Batavia, IL | USA

View Blog | Read Bio

SeaQuest seeks the secrets of the proton

This article appeared in symmetry on Nov. 12, 2013.

Late last week, the SeaQuest experiment began exploring the structure of protons and the behavior of the particles of which they're made. Photo: Sarah Witman, Fermilab

Late last week, the SeaQuest experiment began exploring the structure of protons and the behavior of the particles of which they’re made. Photo: Sarah Witman, Fermilab

Scientists interested in protons and the sea of particles that compose them are in good spirits this week. Researchers from 15 different institutions that participate in the SeaQuest experiment are watching beam flow into their experiment and data flow out.

The SeaQuest experiment, based at Fermilab and managed by a group of scientists from Argonne laboratory, studies the structure of protons and the behavior of the particles of which they’re made.

Protons contain a constantly simmering sea of particles bound together by the aptly named strong force, which is the strongest of the four fundamental interactions of nature—above the weak force, electromagnetism and gravity.

In the experiment, a particle accelerator sends a beam of protons at very high speeds into a target made of either liquid hydrogen or deuterium or solid carbon, iron or tungsten. These bursts of beam come once a minute and each last about 5 seconds.

This causes protons to essentially break apart and release the quarks and antiquarks within. (Antiquarks are the antiparticle of quarks, meaning they have the same mass but opposite charge.)

SeaQuest physicists will then study in great detail the particles that are released during these interactions. Their aim is to resolve questions about the particles that make up the visible mass in our universe.

Initially, experimenters hope to shed light on the internal structure of protons, specifically, the ratio of anti-up quarks to anti-down quarks—two types of antiquarks with different properties.

Results from SeaQuest’s predecessor, NuSea, and DESY’s Hermes experiment, both reported in 1998, found a surprise in measuring the ratio of anti-down quarks to anti-up quarks in the proton; it trended toward a value of less than one. This shook up current assumptions about symmetry between these particles and might hint that we have an incomplete understanding of the strong force.

SeaQuest is re-examining this notion, using beam with about one-eighth of the energy and 50 times the luminosity of that of NuSea.

“We think in several months we will have enough data to confirm what NuSea saw,” says Argonne physicist Paul Reimer, spokesperson for SeaQuest. “Then we of course want to do better, which will take a year or more after that.”

The experiment is also intended to study how exactly the strong force binds these subnuclear particles together and how those effects are modified when the proton is inside an atom’s nucleus rather than isolated and separated from it. Quarks’ angular momentum, also called their “spin,” is known to be distributed differently depending on if the proton is “free” or if it is bound inside a nucleus at the time.

Yet another goal of the experiment is to measure how much energy quarks lose as they pass through cold nuclear matter. Both of these pursuits will be explored simultaneously.

The last time SeaQuest saw beam, during a commissioning run, it lasted about six weeks, from March 8 to the end of April 2012. The data from that run, Reimer says, was useful for debugging the detector and hammering out the algorithms they need to take data this time around.

Over the past year and a half, while beam was shut down for scheduled upgrades, SeaQuest researchers and technicians used that downtime to make technical improvements to the experiment’s spectrometer (pictured above) to enable higher beam quality and smoother delivery of protons, which should result in greater accuracy.

University of Michigan postdoc Josh Rubin says the detector and experiment are ready to take on the mysteries of the proton.

“We are all excited at the chance to study the sea of quarks,” he says.

Sarah Witman

Share

Tags: , ,

3 Responses to “SeaQuest seeks the secrets of the proton”

  1. Gavin Flower says:

    QUESTION:

    Is the proton in normal hydrogen considered free? As technically it is in the nucleus, as it is the nucleus – but there are no other protons & neutrons next to it (ignoring virtual particles). Is an orbiting electron sufficient to make it not free?

    I suspect that it is probably indistinguishable from a ‘totally’ (?) free proton – unless you have extremely good resolution, but I expect the best detectors we are likely to have probably insufficient.

    If I understand the article’s inclusion of liquid Hydrogen as a target correctly, then the proton there is considered sufficiently free.

    I expect that the results for deuterium will be markedly different to that of normal Hydrogen.

    I am curious as to why the other elements were selected, I think I know why iron was selected.

  2. Gavin Flower says:

    Sarah,

    Could you please provide some background to the choice of elements selected as target material.

    Thanks,
    Gavin

  3. Paul E Reimer says:

    Hi Galvin,

    Thanks for your questions. For the proton target, we do use hydrogen. You are correct that the proton is not completely free, but the electroweak force that is binding the electron and proton together is so small compared to both the energy of the proton beam and the strong force holding the quarks together inside the proton that it can be completely ignored. We use a deuterium target because we want to compare protons with neutrons, but there are no free neutrons. The closest we have in nature is deuterium. There is still a small residual strong force in deuterium binding the proton and neutron together that we have to consider. One of the functions of the other targets, carbon, iron, and tungsten is to place limits on the effect of the residual strong force in deuterium, by looking for its effects in targets where the effect should be larger.

    The other targets also allow us to look at how the sea quarks change in heavier targets. To some extent, we could have chosen any combination of heavier targets. These three have several advantages: carbon has the same number of neutrons and protons; iron is commonly used in neutrino experiments, so using this allows us to make a comparison with them; tungsten is a very heavy nucleus, but not that expensive.

    Paul

Leave a Reply

Commenting Policy