James Doherty | Open University | United Kingdom
This article was also published here on CERN’s website.
This weekend CERN hosted its third Summer Student Webfest, a three-day caffeine-fuelled coding event at which participants worked in small teams to build innovative projects using open-source web technologies.
There were a host of projects to inspire the public to learn about CERN and particle physics, and others to encourage people to explore web-based solutions to humanitarian disasters with CERN’s partner UNOSAT.
The event opened with a session of three-minute pitches: participants with project ideas tried to recruit team members with particular skills, from software development and design expertise to acumen in physics. Projects crystallised, merged or floundered as 14 pitches resulted in the formation of eight teams. Coffee was brewed and the hacking commenced…
The weekend was interspersed with mentor-led workshops introducing participants to web technologies. CERN’s James Devine detailed how Arduino products can be used to build cosmic-ray detectors or monitor LHC operation, while developers from PyBossa provided an introduction to building crowdsourced citizen science projects on crowdcrafting.org. (See a full list of workshops).
After three days of hard work and two largely sleepless nights, the eight teams were faced with the daunting task of presenting their projects to a panel of experts, with a trip to the Mozilla Festival in London up for grabs for one member of the overall winning team. The teams presented a remarkable range of applications built from scratch in under 48 hours.
Prizes were awarded as follows:
Best Innovative Project: Terrain Elevation
A mobile phone application that accurately measures elevation. Designed as an economical method of choosing sites with a low risk of flooding for refugee camps.
Best Technology Project: Blindstore
A private query database with real potential for improving online privacy.
Find out more here.
Best Design Project: GeotagX and PyBossa
An easy-to-use crowdsourcing platform for NGOs to use in responding to humanitarian disasters.
Best Educational Project: Run Broton Run
An educational 3D game that uses Kinect technology.
Find out more here.
Overall Winning Project: Particle Clicker
Particle Clicker is an elegantly designed detector-simulation game for web.
“It’s been an amazing weekend where we’ve seen many impressive projects from different branches of technology,” says Kevin Dungs, captain of this year’s winning team. “I’m really looking forward to next year’s Webfest.”
The CERN Summer Student Webfest was organised by François Grey, Ben Segal and SP Mohanty, and sponsored by the Citizen Cyberlab, Citizen Cyberscience Centre, Mozilla Foundation and The Port. Event mentors were from CERN, PyBossa and UNITAR/UNOSTAT. The judges were Antonella del Rosso (CERN Communications), Bilge Demirkoz (CERN Researcher) and Fons Rademakers (CTO of CERN Openlab).
I attended the Australian Accelerator School in January of this year. Better late than never, I recount some of my experiences below.
It’s Day 1 of the Australian Accelerator School and Melbourne is the hottest city on Earth with temperatures soaring above 40°C – which is a bit much when one has just arrived from a soggy UK winter. Fortunately, the Australian Synchrotron is housed in a beautifully air-conditioned building located in the suburbs of Melbourne, just next door to Monash University.
The Australian Synchrotron, which opened in 2007, is the largest stand-alone piece of scientific infrastructure in the southern hemisphere and provides a source of highly intense light which is used for a wide range of research purposes. It is situated on a modern site with the circular synchrotron at its focus, surrounded by several other buildings.
The School has gathered 23 students, mainly from Australia and New Zealand, and an impressive panel of experts. Phil Burrows of Oxford University is the keynote lecturer and will provide a step-by-step guide on the physics and maths underpinning particle accelerators. Ralph Steinhagen of CERN is armed with over 700 slides on the technical aspects of accelerator operation. Toshi Mitsuhashi of KEK, aka the “Master”, will share his vast experience on the optics of accelerators, while Jeff Corbett of SLAC will lead laboratory exercises. And not forgetting Roger Rassool of Melbourne University, who will be present to add his irrepressible energy and enthusiasm to proceedings.
Mornings are to be spent in lectures and afternoons in the lab. In labs we will have the chance to develop practical skills, such as soldering, using oscilloscopes, programming Arduino chips, and modelling electronic circuits and particle accelerators. There are also various international conferences running through the fortnight, some sessions of which we will be attending. The programme will conclude with a group project, to be presented to the experts on the final day of the school. And there’s the odd social event to attend too.
In true Aussie fashion we are welcomed with a barbecue – although we all feel feel more cooked than sausages after a few minutes outdoors. And we’ll be kept sweating over the next 12 days…
Stay tuned for wine + DIY particle physics…
I previously blogged about how CERN is embracing the power of citizen science to assist with it’s research (see here). LHC@home also allows non-scientists to get involved with particle physics at CERN. To learn a bit more about citizen science, I recently attended the third Citizen Cyberscience Summit in London, and was asked by online publication ‘International Science Grid This Week’ to write an article on the event. The article was published here on 12 March 2014, and I replicate it below.
February saw London host the Third Citizen Cyberscience Summit, a three-day event dedicated to the expanding field of citizen science. More than 300 delegates from around the world assembled to network, share ideas, and get creative. The event provided fascinating insight into how computers, mobile phones, and other devices are helping to mobilize the citizen science community. Attendees were left with the distinct impression that citizen science is no passing fad but a movement on the forefront of a fundamental shift in how we approach science and education.
For the uninitiated, citizen science is scientific research conducted in whole or part by amateur or non-professional scientists. There is a spectrum of different kinds of citizen science from ‘crowdsourcing’, in which citizens analyze data, to ‘extreme citizen science’, where scientists collaborate with citizens in problem definition, data collection and analysis.
Citizen science stars
On day one of the summit, keynote speeches from the heavyweights of citizen science left delegates with no doubt that citizen science is a big deal. The crown jewel of citizen science remains the Zooniverse, a top-down crowdsourcing platform where citizens analyze large sets of data, such as pictures of galaxies that need to be classified as elliptical or spiral. The Zooniverse has reached the significant milestone of one million contributors and plans to use human input to program computers for data analysis.
Other leaders in the field include Eyewire, an addictive game in which participants help scientists map neural connections in the brain. Erinma Ochu delivered a heart-warming account of her sunflower project, in which participants grow and help to analyze sunflowers, and Daniel Lombraña González reported on how CrowdCrafting has helped interest groups in the US monitor fracking activities.
World Community Grid, which uses spare capacity on computers and mobile devices to power scientific research on health, poverty and sustainability, was also featured at the summit. Sophia Tu and Juan Hindo of IBM, which sponsors and supports World Community Grid, announced a major scientific breakthrough in childhood cancer. Donated computing capacity has enabled researchers of childhood cancer to discover seven drug candidates that are highly effective at destroying tumors without any apparent side effects. This may also have applications for adult cancers, including breast and lung cancer.
Tu and Hindo also talked at the summit about their experience launching an Android mobile app in partnership with BOINC of the University of California, Berkley, US, last July, becoming one of the first volunteer computing initiatives to go mobile. They found that many citizen scientists are more comfortable downloading a mobile app than installing software on their computer: signups jumped ten times the week of launch and the app quickly reached ‘Top 5 Trending’ status in the Google Play store.
Citizen science’s expanding influence was evidenced by a series of talks on policy and engagement. Jacquie McGlade’s video presentation highlighted the importance of inclusiveness and keeping the gates of citizen science open to all. A recurring theme emerged that citizens are enjoying more autonomy in defining the projects to which they contribute. And Kaitlin Thaney of the Mozilla Science lab argued that the wider researcher community should draw inspiration from citizen science and the web’s open-source revolution to itself become more open and collaborative.
Engaging and empowering citizens
On the second day, the summit moved to less formal surroundings in University College London (UCL), UK, for workshops, panel discussions, and short presentations. A panel debate with five female citizen scientists highlighted the commitment of people engaged with citizen science and the empowerment they experience from contributing to projects.
At a series of talks on DIY citizen science, Francois Grey, coordinator of the Citizen Cyberscience Centre, described how the Lego2nano summer school program mobilized a group of students to construct an atomic force microscope for a fraction of the price of those found in modern labs. Grey argued that because so much can be learned from making and programming technology, young people should be encouraged to become makers, engineers, and programmers.
In the evening, the Citizen Science Cafe also afforded those not attending the conference the opportunity to pop-in after work to mingle with others passionate about citizen science.
What can you do for your community?
By day three of the summit, delegates were chomping at the bit to start doing some citizen science themselves. Saturday’s ‘hackdaychallenge’ provided an opportunity for collaboration on a number of different projects, including: constructing an application that enables citizens to analyze photographs from the International Space Station; making the most of solar panels installed in Ghanian schools; and an application developed by child psychologist Caspar Addyman for analyzing baby laughter. The winning project was the Pulse Sensor Textile Challenge, which aims to measure the impact of textiles on emotions.
The closing keynote presentation was delivered by journalist-turned-academic Jeff Howe, who first coined the term ‘crowdsourcing’. In this entertaining and insightful talk, Howe noted that the most successful crowdsourcing projects are often a gift from an individual to the community, and providediStockphoto.com as an illustrative example. He argued that the cardinal rule of crowdsourcing is that one should ask ‘what can you do for your community, not what your community can do for you’. Like Grey, Howe suggested that citizen science has the potential to bring about a fundamental change in how young people are educated.
More than a passing fad
A recent article in Nature hinted at a certain decline in citizen science, but little evidence of this trend was on display at the summit, which was saturated with energy, enthusiasm and love for citizen science. Grey described the event not as a “thin broth with just one intellectual ingredient but a rich stew of ideas with spices from far-away fields”. This is, indeed, reflective of the pervasive nature of citizen science: there is a vibrant community across the globe analyzing data, playing games, growing sunflowers, posting pictures, monitoring pollution, and more.
So, citizen science seems to be much more than a passing fad that is now in decline. Rather, it is a movement that empowers its participants. That demands openness, collaboration and accessibility. That has the potential to bring about change. And most importantly that recognizes, as Howe puts it, that “everyone has something to offer”.
Believe it not, there are particle accelerators to be found beyond the outer-Geneva area – even in such far flung locations as Melbourne, Australia. You may recall from a previous blog post that I befriended some Aussie particle physicists at CERN during the summer who kindly invited me to a two-week accelerator school at the Australian Synchrotron in Melbourne. And here I am!
The Australian Synchrotron opened in 2007 and is the largest stand-alone piece of scientific infrastructure in the southern hemisphere. It is a source of highly intense light which is used for a wide range of research purposes.
Synchrotrons are circular machines which accelerate electrons to extremely high energies, producing electron beams which travel at almost the speed of light. As the beam of electrons takes a circular path around the machine, the electrons emit intense radiation known as synchrotron light. This light is really useful for imaging, analysis and in a wide range of scientific experiments.
In some accelerators, operators attempt to minimize the emission of synchrotron radiation so that particles retain maximum energy for high-energy collisions. For example, in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), protons are accelerated as they have a much larger mass than electrons and so suffer less from loss of synchrotron radiation. Also, the larger the circumference of the circular path which the particles take, the weaker the synchrotron radiation emission – that’s why the LHC was built with a huge 27 km circumference. Linear accelerators, such as the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) in the US, avoid the emission of synchrotron radiation altogether as particles travel in a straight line.
So a synchrotron’s key output – synchrotron light – is the very same thing which operators of other accelerators voraciously try to minimize.
The Australian Synchrotron’s accelerator school is an intensive two-week course on particle physics and accelerators. It attracts student physicists from across Australia (and occasionally the UK!), as well as lecturers and tutors from leading institutions from across the world.
Stay tuned over the next few weeks to hear about my adventures at the Australian Synchrotron.
The Open University asked me to write an article on my time at CERN over the summer. I replicate the article below which was published by the OU on 5 November 2013 here. The article pulls together my experiences on the CERN Summer Programme and provides links to particular blog entries on this site should you wish to learn more. Enjoy!
I got lucky – very lucky. For I spent this summer at CERN in Switzerland at the world’s greatest laboratory and the birthplace of the Nobel-winning Higgs boson. I am studying physical sciences with the OU and in this article I recount an incredible, challenging and unforgettable summer. I also include links to my blog which you can click to learn more about life at CERN.
What is CERN?
CERN, or the European Organization for Nuclear Research, is an international organisation which operates the world’s largest particle physics laboratory. At CERN scientists use complex scientific instruments to probe the fundamental structure of the universe and basic constituents of matter – fundamental particles.
CERN is the home of the world’s largest machine, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): a 27km circular particle accelerator that collides particles which are travelling at close to the speed of light. The LHC was used to observe the Higgs boson, a particle which is the by-product of a mechanism by which other fundamental particles acquire mass. This observation led to Peter Higgs and Francois Englert being announced as winners of a Nobel Prize for Physics in October 2013.
The Student Summer Programme
Each year CERN invites around 300 physics, engineering and computer science students from across the globe to participate in its Summer Student Programme. The programme affords students the opportunity to attend a six week lecture series on particle physics and related topics, and also to carry out a research project.
Learn more about the CERN Summer Student Programme here.
CERN is plonked in the midst of beautiful agricultural estates which nestle between the Alps and Jura mountain ranges, with several sites on either side of the Swiss-French border. Smaller experiments are based on the main Meyrin site on the outskirts of Geneva, while larger accelerators, such as the LHC, extend into France.
On arrival one is rather taken aback by how plain, industrial and, dare I say, ugly CERN is. Buildings are haphazardly distributed and typical of 1960 university campus architecture. But there is more to CERN than first meets the eye.
More first impressions here.
What are the people like?
There are approximately 10,000 people on the CERN site each day who hail from all corners of the Earth. One need only walk into the main restaurant at lunchtime to sense the excitement in the air at CERN. People know they’re involved with something special and they want to be there. The diverse, multicultural and enthusiastic workforce creates a fantastic atmosphere.
The lecture series was intense, technical and extremely interesting. Topics ranged from theoretical and mathematical subjects, such as the Standard Model and Supersymmetry (theoretical models which explain how fundamental particles interact), to more applied and technical topics, such as the operation of particle accelerators and detectors. Lectures were delivered by leaders in the field and daily Q&A sessions provided an excellent opportunity to interrogate them.
More on the lecture series here.
I worked in the Beam Instrumentation Group to develop a new type of beam position monitor (BPM) for the LHC. This is a gizmo which measures the position of the beams of particles which circulate around the LHC so that they can be kept on target. The project was very hands-on and involved playing with lasers and crystals. This new type of BPM might someday be installed in the LHC so it was exciting to be involved with its development.
The social life
Bringing together 300 students inevitably leads to an active social scene. There was lots going on including parties on site, trekking in the mountains, trips to nearby Swiss towns, dance classes, and music festivals. Geneva also provided enough entertainment, cheese and wine to keep most amused, satiated and merry. My favourite activity was having a swim in Lake Geneva.
What did I learn?
I learned a lot at CERN. One of the most striking features of modern physics is that we are still largely in the dark – literally. The matter which everything we can see, including ourselves, is composed of makes up a mere 4% of the universe. The rest is dark matter and dark energy. Supersymmetry holds some promise for a deeper understanding of dark matter but as far as dark energy – which accounts for 73% of the universe – is concerned, we haven’t got the foggiest. It is this kind of mystery which I think makes science so alluring.
I also learned that there are exciting times ahead for physics. CERN is mostly closed for business at the moment as its accelerators are being upgraded but when the LHC is switched back on in 2015, it is going to reach incredible collision energies approaching 7 TeV. Higher energies means different kinds of stuff might fly out of the particle collisions. So the observation of the Higgs boson may be just the tip of the iceberg of a whole new generation of fundamental particles and physics.
Will I go back?
I had a fantastic time at CERN and would love to return one day… if they’ll have me.
As the dust settles following the announcement of the winners of the 2013 Nobel prize for physics, it is worth pausing for a moment to contemplate the man who – reluctantly – gave his name to a boson.
On 8 October 2013, at around 10am GMT, the Nobel committee concluded its deliberations, identified this year’s laureates, and made a few phone calls. In an apartment in Edinburgh a telephone rang, and rang…
Peter Higgs was in a little pub in Leith, a beautiful area to the north of Edinburgh, enjoying a nice bowl of soup, some fish and a pint. It was only when he returned to Edinburgh that an old neighbour congratulated him on the ‘good news’. He replied, “oh, what news?”. On being informed that he had been awarded science’s highest honour, the 84 year-old Emeritus professor resignedly trudged back to his apartment – and its ringing telephone.
Higgs was born in Newcastle in 1925, the son of an Englishman and Scotswoman. He was home-schooled in his early years then, when his family relocated to Bristol, he attended Cotham Grammar School where he was a prize-winning pupil – but not in physics. It was only when he read the works of Paul Dirac, an old boy of his school, that physics really captured his imagination. Higgs went on to be awarded first class honours in undergraduate physics at Kings College London before completing a Masters and PhD in molecular physics. In 1960 he took up a permanent lecture post in Edinburgh.
The Highland air clearly agreed with Higgs, for it was during his walks in Scotland’s rugged mountain ranges that he is said to have conceived a theory of how certain fundamental particles acquire mass. In October 1964 he submitted two papers to the journal Physics Letters, the second of which related to this theory and what is now known as the Higgs field. The first paper was published but the second was rejected and stated to have “no obvious relevance to physics”. On reviewing the paper, Yoichiro Nambu, a respected physicist of the time, suggested Higgs may like to explain the physical implications of his theory. So Higgs inserted a paragraph explaining that the excitation of the Higgs field would yield a particle, which would come to be known as the Higgs boson. Higgs resubmitted the amended paper to rival journal Physical Review Letters, which published it later in 1964.
Around the same time other theorists were working on similar ideas. Belgium’s Robert Brout and Francois Englert published a paper prior to Higgs in 1964 and, although their paper didn’t explicitly refer to the boson, it was the first to propose the mechanism now known as the Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism. Another trio of scientists, Kibble, Guralnik and Hagen, also helped to refine the theory behind this mechanism, which is now a keystone of the Standard Model.
Higgs went on to enjoy a successful career in physics, be appointed to various distinguished posts, and win many awards. It was however his work on the Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism which remains his most notable contribution to the field.
On attending a conference in Sicily in early July 2012, Higgs was tipped off by CERN veteran John Ellis that the observation of the Higgs boson may be announced at a seminar planned for the 4th July at CERN, Geneva. Once he and his travel companion, Alan Walker, were satisfied they had sufficient clean underpants between them to extend their trip, they changed their flights. The observation of the Higgs boson was indeed announced and both Higgs and Englert, who had never previously met, were present. Higgs shed a tear of joy following the announcement and on being asked why he was so moved, he stated that it was people’s reaction to the news and how much it meant to them that so profoundly affected him. On the plane back to Edinburgh he celebrated with a bottle of London pride – a working-man’s ale.
Back to 2013, and Higgs must endure the media storm which inevitably follows a Nobel laureate to be. He will patiently give interviews and press conferences but one strongly suspects that he would prefer to be back in Leith having a pint. What I so admire about Higgs, other than his obvious scientific brilliance, is what an understated and humble man he is. Where some seem to ravenously crave a Nobel, one suspects Higgs would prefer not to have to bother with the accompanying kerfuffle. Indeed Higgs rejected a knighthood as he did not want “that sort of title”. He has been at pains to emphasise the contributions of the five other original authors of the Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism, and the thousands of other scientists at CERN and beyond involved with the observation of the Higgs boson. He belittles his contribution to science as compared to the likes of Einstein as it only took “two or three weeks in 1964” to concoct. And to top it all he is just about the only person who refers to the Higgs boson as the ‘scalar boson’. In today’s highly competitive, often cut-throat, social media driven society, his dignified, gentle and modest character is wonderfully refreshing.
Higgs plans to retire from his busy lecture schedule when he hits the ripe age of 85. He leaves behind a world of science full of uncertainty. The Higgs boson looks awfully like the Standard Model Higgs boson but is it a supersymmetrical Higgs boson? Are there other types of Higgs boson waiting to be discovered when the Large Hadron Collider is switched back on in 2015? And what about dark matter and dark energy – what on Earth are they all about?
One thing is certain however – they don’t make ’em like Peter Higgs anymore.
This morning Professors Peter Higgs and Francois Englert were awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics for their predictions, made in 1964, of a mechanism which explains how certain fundamental particles such as quarks and electrons acquire mass. The mechanism is a key constituent of the Standard Model, our best model for explaining the interaction of fundamental particles. The award crowns a pair of remarkable careers and concludes a gloriously romantic story.
Francois Englert spoke directly to the press following the announcement and declared that he was “extraordinarily happy to have the recognition of this extraordinary award”. He intends to congratulate Peter Higgs on the “very important and excellent work” which he completed during the 1960s.
Here are some of the key milestones on the long and remarkable journey of these two Nobel laureates.
A fortunate rejection
In August 1964, Robert Brout and Francois Englert of the Free University of Brussels published a landmark paper which detailed the mechanism by which elementary particles such as quarks and electrons acquire mass. At around the same time, Peter Higgs of Edinburgh University submitted two papers on what is now known as the Higgs field to the journal Physics Letters. The second of those papers was rejected – and a good thing it was too. Respected physicist, Yoichiro Nambu, who reviewed Higgs’ paper suggested that he may wish to elaborate on his theory’s physical implications. In response, Higgs added a paragraph which said that an excitation of the Higgs field would yield a new particle. This particle came to be known as the Higgs boson.
Higgs resubmitted the paper to an opposition journal, Physical Review Letters, which published it later in October 1964.
Accurate predictions but no cigar
In the mid 1990’s the Higgs was back in the public eye. Although it had not yet been observed, it had enabled the Standard Model to make a number of successful predictions, including the discovery of the top quark at 176 GeV made by Fermilab’s Tevatron.
Experiments at Fermilab’s Tevatron and CERN’s Large Electron Positron (LEP) Collider had concluded that the Higgs must exist above 117 GeV, but neither was sensitive enough to probe at these energy levels. Enter the mammoth Large Hadron Collider (LHC) into the fray in 2008. This beastly circular accelerator, with a circumference of 27 km and phenomenally powerful electromagnets, promised collision energies approaching 14 TeV. So the observation of the Higgs boson was considered, surely, imminent – until the LHC blew up after nine days of operation and was closed down for more than a year of repairs.
Patience Professors, patience…
On 4 July 2012 science’s worst kept secret was publicly announced at CERN, Geneva. Spokespersons of the ATLAS and CMS detectors announced that they had observed a ‘Higgs-like particle’ at 126 GeV and CERN’s Director General, Rolfe-Dieter Heur, declared – “I think we have it”. Peter Higgs sat in the room and shed a tear of joy. He also met a chap called Francois Englert for the first time that day.
And the winner is…
So it took almost 50 years, a $10 billion machine and the input of thousands upon thousands of scientists, engineers and mathematicians, but technology caught up with theory and proved Francois Englert and Peter Higgs right. There may be some grumblings that the observation of the Higgs boson also deserved the recognition of the Nobel Committee, but I think no one would begrudge these two extraordinary men science’s ultimate accolade. It has certainly been a long time coming.
Well done chaps – you thoroughly deserve it!
In less than 24 hours the 2013 Nobel Prize for Physics will be announced and there seems to be one word on everyone’s lips… Higgs. The scientific community appears to hope en masse that Peter Higgs and Francois Englert collect a Nobel for their prediction of the Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism, the mechanism by which elementary particles such as quarks and electrons acquire mass. There is however competition. Here are some of the other front-runners:
Iron-based superconductors – Hideo Hosono
Superconducting materials have zero electrical resistance when cooled below a critical temperature – a very useful property as it allows for the highly efficient transfer of electrical signals. Today’s most efficient superconductors incorporate a layer of superconducting copper oxide which must be cooled to very low temperatures to operate. For example, in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) the operating temperature of the superconducting electromagnets, which are used to steer the beam of particles around the accelerator, is retained at around -271°C. The highest temperature at which today’s superconductors can operate is around -140°C, which is still fairly chilly.
The possibility of an iron-based superconductor, which could in theory have a much higher critical temperature, had previously been dismissed as it was assumed that the large magnetic moment of iron prevented the emergence of pairs of electrons known as ‘Cooper pairs’, which are required for superconductivity in conventional superconductors. However, in 2008 Hideo Hoson of the Tokyo Institute of Technology accidentally stumbled across the first iron-based layered superconductor. Iron-based devices may hold the key to the holy grail of superconductivity – room temperature superconductors – which would certainly make running the LHC at bit cheaper!
Discovery of extrasolar planets – Geoffrey Marcy, Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz
In 1995 Michael Mayor and Didier Queloz of the University of Geneva announced the discovery of a massive exoplanet in orbit around the star 51 Pegasi, and they used a sneaky technique know as the radial velocity method to find it. The gravitational field of the orbiting planet causes 51 Pegasi to ‘wobble’ in its own small orbit. Using the Doppler effect, Mayor and Queloz were able to measure the variations in the radial velocity of 51 Pegasi, that is the speed at which the star was moving towards and away from Earth in its orbit, to infer the existence of a massive exoplanet. Clever!
Geoffrey Marcy of the University of California has discovered more exoplanets than anybody else, including 70 out of the first 100 identified. Indeed he was the first to verify the existence of Mayor and Queloz’s exoplanet around 51 Pegasi. He has also discovered the first transiting planet around another star, the first extrasolar planet beyond 5 AU, the first Neptune-sized exoplanets, and the first multiple planet system around a star similar to the Sun. He is the quintessential planet-hunter.
And the winner is…
So tomorrow’s announcement is not a foregone conclusion. Profs Englert and Higgs, and any others hoping to be awarded a Higgs-related Nobel prize, have some stiff competition. Exoplanets have provided some of the buzziest science headlines in recent years, while iron-based superconductors could have hugely significant practical applications, including in particle physics.
However, one senses that it is perhaps the right time for science’s ultimate accolade to be awarded for the prediction and/or observation of the Higgs, which has undoubtedly been one of the most significant discoveries in science in the past century. And with Profs Englert and Higgs in their 80s and Nobels not awarded posthumously (which is why Robert Brout, who collaborated with Englert and died in 2011, cannot be awarded the prize), one suspects that the Nobel committee is somewhat feeling the pressure.
Stay tuned to Quantum Diaries tomorrow where we’ll be blogging live to keep you informed of the latest developments in the run-up to and following the prize announcements. I will also be doing a bit of tweeting @JimmyDocco. And there is already an excellent blog post up in anticipation of the big announcement here.
They say a picture says a thousand words – so here is my story of a summer at CERN in 12,000 words.