• USLHC
  • USLHC
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Frank
  • Simon
  • MPI for Physics
  • Germany

Latest Posts

  • Flip
  • Tanedo
  • USLHC
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Aidan
  • Randle-Conde
  • USLHC
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Karen
  • Andeen
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

Latest Posts

  • Jonathan
  • Asaadi
  • Syracuse University
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Byron
  • Jennings
  • TRIUMF
  • Canada

Latest Posts

  • Adam
  • Davis
  • USLHC
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Seth
  • Zenz
  • USLHC
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Alexandre
  • Fauré
  • CEA/IRFU
  • FRANCE

Latest Posts

  • Jim
  • Rohlf
  • USLHC
  • USA

Latest Posts

  • Emily
  • Thompson
  • USLHC
  • Switzerland

Latest Posts

  • Ken
  • Bloom
  • USLHC
  • USA

Latest Posts

TRIUMF | Vancouver, BC | Canada

Read Bio

Best field trip ever

Friday, July 8th, 2011

– By Peter Vogel, ICT/Physics teacher at the Notre Dame Regional Secondary School in Vancouver BC

I write this from a desk inside one of the older buildings that make up CERN, the European Centre for Nuclear Research, outside Geneva, Switzerland. Save for the wireless access I have here, the room looks  as if no one has been in here since the 1960s. Two ancient projectors stand at the back of the room, still aimed at the board on which they last projected.

Yet mere metres from my seat, which surely a Nobel laureate or two has graced, is the most complex physics experiment the world has ever seen. Just across the road and around a hundred metres below the surface of this gentle farming countryside, beats the heart of the Large Hadron Collider.

I am fortunate to have been chosen to represent Canada here at CERN for the HST2011 summer high school physics teachers program, a experience quite unlike any I’ve had in more than thirty years of  teaching.

The author, centre, with HST2011 attendees from Australia, the US, Brazil and Slovakia, in front of the faceplate for CERN's Compact Muon Solenoid particle detector on the Large Hadron Collider beam, 100 m below the French countryside near Cessy.

Despite Canada’s obvious presence here at CERN, it seems that I am the first physics teacher to represent the country at this program. To ensure that such representation continues in subsequent years, I am documenting much of what I experience through Twitter (the words “I am  jealous of you” have come up in response), through a blog and through email postings to the BC Association of Physics Teachers mailing list.

Earlier this week I had the distinct pleasure of meeting William Trischuk of the University of Toronto and a representative of the Institute of Particle Physics (one of the agencies that has made possible my trip to CERN). As it turns out, he was here for a regular shift on the ATLAS experiment on the LHC.

It’s been just a week here at HST2011, a blur of acronyms, lectures, experiments, and visits to the most complex equipment I’ve ever seen. It is indeed an amazing experience to be here, and to be able to share  it with colleagues from more than twenty nations makes it all the more enriching.

– The CAP high school/CEGEP teacher award is co-sponsored by APEGBC, the Canadian Association of Physicists, TRIUMF, Merlan Scientific, Perimeter Institute, Nelson Education, and Vernier. The British Columbia and Yukon award is further sponsored by BC Innovation Council. Travel costs were sponsored by the Institute of Particle Physics, as well as TRIUMF & the Perimeter Institute.

Share

Science, Media, and Politics (Part II)

Monday, June 27th, 2011

— by T. “Isaac” Meyer, Head, Strategic Planning & Communications

One thing we have to add to this discussion is how media, news, and analysis enter into the political and policy-making process.  One clear objective of science communications and even any corporate communications activity is to influence decision makers.  But are the traditional streams of media still relevant?

Fortunately, our excellent and thoughtful friends at the National Journal have just publicly released a detailed study of U.S. federal senior executive, Capitol Hill staff, and professional lobbyists that documents how information arrives and is used “inside the Beltway” in Washington, D.C.   The study is entitled “Washington in the Information Age” and is, lightly put, brilliant.

With grateful flattery, I reproduce some of their conclusions here.

1. As the dust settles, traditional platforms (TV, print media, and radio) remain essential components of the media mix.  The report compiles hundreds of interviews and surveys to map out how U.S. political and policy staff receive their news.  Perhaps as a surprise, it is NOT all by Twitter and Facebook. Rather, the new technologies serve as alert mechanisms with trusted, credible analysis still being sought from the traditional sources.

2. Despite the plethora of choices, opinion makers associated with long-established brans carry the most influence online. We all worry that a random citizen in Darkmoor, Pennsylvania, or Blackwater, California, can publish an online blog and start a slanted or even misinforming news source.  It looks like the folks in Washington still rely on verifiable,  credible, long-established names and resources to gather their views.

3. Yet, Washington insiders value a long tail of unique opinion makers.  More than 400 distinct names were cited as credible sources for opinion from among the survey group.  So the Beltway doesn’t follow one columnist or one voice; rather, each person tends to accumulate a set of trusted brands/thought-leaders and then sticks to them over time.  So less fly-by-night than perhaps expected!

4. Washington insiders favour news sources that share political point of view. Perhaps obvious, but results show that Washingtonians cluster around columnists, news sources, and so on that reflect their own ideologies.

5. No longer just for e-mail, mobile devices are a gateway to news and information.  Many Washington insiders now read news and analysis on the small screen and some actually do a good portion of their composition and analysis on the small screen.

6. Mobile devices and new digital communication tools continue to blur the line between the personal the professional. As in, with 24 hour news cycles and multiple streams of referrals and content providers, Washington insiders often mix work and play when communicating digitally.  As anyone who has visited Washington knows, this is supported by the standard screens at a sports bar.  Not only are two or three games showing at the same time, but at least one TV shows CNN and CSPAN.

7. Online video and audio have yet to infringe on the dominance of TV and radio.  Despite the prevalence of online videos and podcasts, few Washington insiders report that they rely on these sources for content.  They are viewed primarily as entertaining.

8. The national obsession with Twitter fades inside the Beltway. Results suggest that Twitter is not a preferred communication tool and the common conception is that 50% of tweets are pointless babble, and the next 30% shameless self-promotion. Beyond that, there is some real content.

9. Social networking sites are popular inside the Beltway. As a tool to track contacts, trade views, and keep up with the vast network of potential wanna-know-yous, social networking tools are growing in use. Perhaps not surprisingly, the growth area for these tools is with Capitol Hill staff who have a tendency to involve more younger people than senior executives or K Street lobbyists.

10. The more things change, the more they stay the same.  Washington’s reliance on proven relationships extends online.  That is, the influencers of the influencers still have specific, personal, trusted connections. Other results of the study show that Washington insiders filter their e-mail by known e-mail addresses, then subject lines, again caring more about WHO than WHAT.

The study is powerful insight into how Washington is adapting to the age of information overload.

When I look at my own day, I can see some parallels to the report’s results.  I spend quality time with print media most often in the form of magazines (monthly more often than weekly) and I rely on news aggregators and other alerts to queue me to new content, but I hunt down my favourite sources to find out “what is really going on.”

Graphic depicting how Washingtonians "flip" between news sources to follow a story.

Please read, compare, and comment!

Share

Is Science Journalism an Oxymoron, Vanishing Art, or…

Wednesday, June 22nd, 2011

–by T. “Isaac” Meyer, Head of Strategic Planning and Communications

I spent last night at the Vancouver Aquarium with some of my most talented colleagues and a few fish. We were attending the launch of the Vancouver branch office of the Science Media Centre of Canada. The event featured a panel discussion led by Canadian science icon Jay Ingram and a short reception in a darkened exhibit area surrounding by smiling sea animals. It was fantastic—and it prompted some existential conversations over bite-sized appies and the drive home.

The most important feature of the evening was that it was a PERFECT Vancouver evening. Literally. 65 degF, clear sky, amazing sunset. Oh, and then we went inside for the event.

A tough day in Vancouver.

Jay Ingram is a celebrity of Canadian science and communications. Most recently, he hosted and produced Discovery Channel’s Daily Planet¸ perhaps the most-watched and most-loved science show on Canadian television. For years, Jay would find something new in science, make it simple and inspiring, and work to share it with the public each day of the week. That’s commitment.

The panel included Lisa Johnson (CBC news reporter), Jennifer Gardy (BC CDC scientist and communicator), Candis Callison (UBC professor of journalism), and Marcello Pavan (a graduate of Quantum Diaries and TRIUMF’s outreach coordinator). Jay did something very clever and actually interviewed each of them separately on the stage for 3-4 minutes before starting the panel discussion. This provided an intimate conversation for the audience to get to know each panelist instead of the usual “prepared remarks going down along the table.”

Lisa talked about the timeline of a story. She might find out at 10am what she has to research, interview, shoot, edit, and air by 6pm that same day. That means a 30 minute delay in reaching someone credible could be a deal breaker. Jennifer talked about how important it is to give the journalist freedom to choose the angle of the story that works for them; she also said that the highest honour a journalist can pay a scientist is a chance to review the final copy of the story for any errors. Candis spoke about the skyrocketing role of new media and the challenges of communicating science as it evolves and changes at the forefronts. Marcello talked about the challenge of talking to people who have already made up their mind; he said his #1 piece of advice to journalists interviewing scientists is to give up that science is hard and that it’s too technical to make sense. As a scientist, its hard to do an interview with someone who has already decided you speak gibberish and cannot be understood!

The Q&A discussion with the audience covered some tough topics.

When science or science results are unpopular, surprising, or complex, who is responsible for championing the cause and getting them out there? Everyone has heard examples and allegations about governments around the world muzzling scientists for sharing research results that undermine policy positions or policy decisions. Are scientists themselves accountable for fighting the machine and having their truths known? What role should the media play? What about when scientists don’t know what the truth is, such as in the first few days of the Fukushima disaster where misinformation was 10 times more available than facts and yet everybody wanted a rock-solid assessment.

In the age of internet democracy, everyone and anyone can be a credible expert. It used to be that the newspaper was credible and if you saw it there, there were good odds it was true and verifiable. Nowadays, anyone can write a blog, run an online newspaper, or make a viral YouTube video that claims to be the truth. In some cases, crowd-sourced journalism can allow the public instant and immediate access to ground truth. In other cases, it means that a credible analysis can be excoriated by an anonymous user with only an e-mail address.

How can an organization like SMCC have an impact in this environment? The goal of SMCC is to raise the level of public discourse in Canada by helping journalists access evidence-based research. With this intention, the organization was formed to act as a bridge and a reliable clearinghouse and resource for scientists and the media alike. There was a lot of discussion about how to ensure that the organization could remain independent while also acting like a partner in the crucial moments when science hits the headlines. Likewise, instead of “science” sections in the newspapers, there is now science in almost every front-page story. SMCC will be helping the non-science reporters get the information they need so that the front-page headlines are accurate, timely, and useful to the public.

A fascinating evening and hats off to Jay Ingram and the panelists! Well done, and let’s do it again soon.

Share

Heuer, Canadian Physics, a Pisspot, and …

Sunday, June 19th, 2011

– by Nigel S. Lockyer, Director

The Canadian Association of Physicists (CAP) met last week in St. John’s, Newfoundland (a huge island it turns out), off the most eastern part of Canada. Newfoundland-Labrador (NL) (one of 10 Canadian provinces…joined the federation in March 31, 1949) is remote with a ruggedly beautiful coastline and—at this time of year—cool, rainy, and foggy. NL is famous for icebergs floating by the coast, pods of whales, schools of capelins, and millions of sea birds. Check out the maps, weather, and iceberg tracking.

Capelin fish.

A capelin is the fish the whales eat. They come to shore to spawn in June and July, followed by the whales, and everyone in town benefits, except of course the capelins. Looks like a “lycoptera” to me.

Rolf-Dieter Heuer, DG of CERN, attended the first day of the meeting and gave a public lecture in the evening to the conference delegates, university students, and local citizens. Standing-room only in an auditirium for at least 1,000!  It was a superb and captivating lecture for physicists outside of particle physics and for the public alike. Rolf is a tremendous spokesperson for CERN and particle physics.   During his daytime itinerary, Rolf participated in several sessions and panel discussions where he spoke passionately about the opportunity for Canada to work with CERN more closely as one of the first “associate members” from overseas.

One of the CAP meeting highlights was the T2K result, which reported a 2.5 sigma effect on theta-13, an angle that measures the degree to which flavours “1″ and “3″ of neutrinos change back and forth into one another. This result, if it holds, has major implications for the next-generation long-baseline neutrino experiments being discussed around the world. It is possible decisions will take place about proceeding to search for CP violation in the neutrino sector in the next 5 years…a billion dollar program wherever it is built.

Another conference highlight was the inaugural award of the CAP-TRIUMF Medal for Subatomic Physics named after Erich W. Vogt, one of the founders of TRIUMF and an early director of the laboratory.  Professor Vogt travelled to Newfoundland for the conference specifically for the purpose of handing the medal to David Sinclair (a professor at Carleton and a senior research scientist at TRIUMF) for his contributions to the SNO experiment.  It was a special moment as David acknowledged that he’d always seen Erich as a mentor.

Although most of the conference was work, we did get a few minutes to go outside and look around.  Touring the local historical sites was fun. Almost everyone visited Signal Hill (site of the first radio transmission across the Atlantic) and Cape Spear, the most eastern point in Canada. Cape Spear has the second oldest lighthouse in Canada. The tour, given by a young woman from Labrador (the first person I have met from Labrador), was fascinating. The lighthouse had been run for seven generations by the same family….yes seven. They hired a technician to keep the lighthouse maintenance up to snuff and to rewind the clockwork mechanism every three hours. This individual lived in a small room in the lighthouse, next to his minimal work shop.  The room was so cold in winter that our Labrador tour guide said the “contents of the pisspot froze” (FYI — “piss” is an acceptable word in haute-Canada).  I also learned about the big technological advance in lamps: when the wick on oil lamps was upgraded to be cylindrical rather than flat and a fluted glass chimney was attached. The round wick improved oxygen flow and most importantly increased light output versus a candle by a factor of seven and eliminated the smoke and hence the need to clean the glass chimneys and Fresnel lense so often. The Swiss physicist Argand is credited with this innovation in 1781.

Barrerl of sperm-whale oil.

The whales they caught provided the oil for the lamps. Barrels of sperm whale oil were stored next to the maintenance man’s bedroom and his piss-pot.

The final topic to share is the controversy over the Canadian sealing industry, strongly supported in NL. If you are inclined, check out http://www.ifaw.org/ifaw_canada_english/ or for the other side of the argument see http://speeches.empireclub.org/61890/data?n=20

I’ll remember this trip because I watched the Vancouver Canucks lose the seventh game of the Stanley Cup to Boston in a local St. John’s bar, a piss…, made worse by all the local Boston fans!  (just kidding)  It was a privilege to have our team in the finals.

 

Share

Fish from China…and the Promise of More Fishing Together

Thursday, June 16th, 2011

–by Nigel S. Lockyer, Director

Scientists from the China Institute of Atomic Energy (CIAE) and the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) visited TRIUMF this past week (Tuesday, June 7) and gave me an unusual and exotic gift. I received a fossil of a fish—a herring-like fish!

This present seems well above average.  My first thought was about how they had carried the present thousands of miles, since they were coming from NSF in Washington, DC, and Brookhaven National Lab in the USA. The fossil was encased in a frame the size of a small book with a glass cover. The fossil was of Lycoptera, a fish that existed in China and that part of the world during the Jurassic period (200 million to 145 million years ago). This was the period of dinosaurs, reptiles, first birds, and, yes, fish. It was a time when atmospheric CO2 was 900 ppm, as opposed to present levels of about 390 ppm and the world was hot, on average three degrees Celsius above today’s temperatures…. a very different place from today (I hope).  Erudite papers suggest the Lycoptera is a member of the Leptolepidae family (“Delicate Scales”), an appealing name to me as a particle physicist (reminds me of the leptoquark…also a fossil, but from the beginnings of the Universe).

"Photocopy" of the Lycoptera fish fossil

The NSFC visitors indicated they expected Chinese science investments to grow by 20% per year.  One consequence of that is China now has plans for three rare-isotope beam facilities. Wow!  Finally, let me say we thanked our Chinese visitors by presenting them with six high quality ballpoint pens with TRIUMF, Vancouver BC, emblazoned on the side.

Share

Balance…and Greatness

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

–by Josie Farrell, CHRP, Manager of Employee HR Services

During a recent trip to the UK, I was able to visit Beachy Head, a very dramatic chalk cliff on the south coast. The spot reminded me of the incredible impact that our own personal surroundings can have on our well-being. The chalk cliffs are the highest sea cliffs in Britain, and they are pristine and open with no boundaries or fences. Sitting at the cliff’s edge and looking out at the expansive English Channel really focused my mind. It was like my own personal retreat. (Did I mention I did not have my laptop?)

How easy it is to just accept all the clutter in our lives. Perhaps working in Human Resources make me more attuned to this fuzzy stuff, but let’s face it, most of us spend most of our time trying to survive the chaos in our daily lives –– commuting, traffic, work demands, dealing with vast amounts of e-mail, meetings, paper clutter and files, getting kids to and from school and pets to the vet—and don’t forget that significant other. You know what I mean. Our worlds can be chaos. Even physicists experience this. I know. They’ve told me so. They are human, too!

I work with many who try to juggle work and life issues to achieve some sort of balance while still focusing on their world-class research projects. Somehow, amazingly, they seem to do it. But like anything in life, there has to be moderation, there really must be balance. Each of you reading this has demands on your time.

Whenever our schedules become out of balance, our energy drops. I have read that lowered energy creates the illusion that there isn’t enough time in a day, so a vicious cycle of time limitation occurs. So why not create some simplicity in your life? You may not be able to escape and go sit at Beachy Head like I did, but you could clean some clutter from your work space or at home, or just turn your computer off. Create your own retreat for at least a moment or two in your day.

When asked how we should live our lives, Stephen Hawking replied: “We should seek the greatest value of our action.”

Share

Brains Don’t Last Forever

Thursday, May 19th, 2011

–by Nigel S. Lockyer, Director

The Prime Minister of Canada (who now has a majority government for the next four years) plans to emphasize among other things brain research. TRIUMF is already involved in brain research, especially Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and some aspects of addiction and depression. Our nuclear-medicine division supports and collaborates with a superb team of researchers at Pacific Parkinson’s Research Centre (based at UBC) and have done so for over 20 years. Recently it has expanded into Alzheimer’s. Neurodegenerative diseases are special in that none of them have cures or simple diagnostic processes. Major discoveries and progress are being made, thank goodness, but complete understanding, let alone cures, is elusive.

Behind all this rhetoric about the value of brain research is an age-old public policy question: fund new breakthroughs (i.e., brain research) or fund distribution & implementation of existing ones (i.e., build new, modern centres for the growing population of mentally diseased, ageing people). Not an easy choice.

Since my father has recently been admitted to a Long Term Care Facility in Guelph, Ontario, Canada, the difficulty of this choice has become acutely evident. His new facility is one where the doors are always locked, a necessary measure to protect the residents from themselves…many wander and would get lost or hurt off the grounds. About 75% are in wheelchairs with head and neck motion constrained, and the majority suffer from some form of dementia.

However, it is a pleasant and brightly lit place. For Mother’s Day they held a concert called “Rowdy Country Tunes” sung by a local guitarist (I am guessing he was 75 years young). It was mostly Elvis Presley tunes, and the auditorium looked from the back like a drive-in movie except it was wheelchairs parked wall-to-wall replacing the cars.

The staff and volunteers are totally dedicated in their attempts to provide a stimulating and nurturing environment for residents who struggle daily with tasks such as finding their own rooms, eating, controlling verbal outbursts, or even making eye contact. Simple games such as pushing a beach ball back and forth can be a challenge.

The most popular game it seems is trying to get out of the locked floor. The exit is always crowded with wheelchair escapees. The most often heard phrase is “How do I get out of here?” My dad told me recently that he can’t get out because he cannot get past all of the wheelchairs. I replied, “Yeah, Dad, the traffic is rough here.” However, if you open the door, expect a stampede! This game, they all seem to understand.

Each resident has a private or semi-private room. However, the great symmetry of the hallways and building, perhaps a good thing in physics, is not good for finding your room. When I was in my dad’s room, inevitably several residents would wander into his room and look shocked that we were in “their” room. All a part of the character of the place, all a part of what our brains and bodies do in the final chapters of our lives.

On the second evening of my recent visit, during the well-choreographed recreational time, I sat with my dad and about a dozen residents while they listened to country music (Hank Williams seems to appeal to this group) and played catch with the beach ball. I sat with this group for about an hour and then it was time to leave. One person was staring at me, since I was obviously (at least, I hope) not a full member of the club, and so I said, “Good night.” About 90% of the room replied with “Good night!” I was floored. They were all fully aware of my presence and wanted to connect with me. I had had no idea. It was quite a touching moment and I realized though they might all appear to be immobilized, or suffering from Alzheimer’s, they sometimes, maybe just sometimes, they just want to communicate. That is when you realize that these are the moments all family members wait for—those special times when there is a fleeting glimpse of the person they once were. That is what keeps us all going.

Health care of this type is highly people intensive and expensive. In my view, Canada does a good job in this area. Employees (and many volunteers) in these facilities are dedicated, caring, cheery, loving, and tender. It is really just amazing.

Physicists work on advanced medical technologies all the time, from PET scanners, medical isotopes, and accelerators for cancer therapy to MRI, contrast imaging, laser surgery, and so on. Yet I had to ask myself what we as a field could do to help these special old folks. My first thought was better technology—more breakthroughs, better tools, better understanding of the progress of ageing. But while this is necessary, there seems to be no substitute at the moment for personalized care….one on one for the people who really are there right now.

As a lab director, I often think about how politicians make decisions on what to fund: What events affect their inner priorities? My guess is that much of it is personal experience. Next time you see a politician, just think that it is they who have to choose between funding brain research or the multitude of long-term care facilities for our aging populations. It is not that easy to choose…help people now or potential help in the future…but we surely need more brain research.

A few people agree. Check out the cool building in Las Vegas by the Canadian-American architect Frank Gehry. What is it? It’s the Cleveland Clinic’s Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, of course!

Frank Gehry designed Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health

Canadian architect Frank Gehry designed the Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health in Las Vegas

Share

Leading the Mind

Wednesday, May 18th, 2011

– By Jennifer Gagné, Web Publishing Coordinator

I have a new endeavour at TRIUMF — giving tours! I’ve been at TRIUMF for 2 ½ years now; just long enough for the “newness” to wear off, but not nearly long enough to know even half of what happens here, even as part of the communications team. Giving tours is absolutely fantastic! It’s my chance to see the lab through new eyes. I get to share in the excitement of seeing this visually-crazy, mind-expanding, totally-different-than-you-were-expecting place for the first time with visitors.

There really is something tremendous about visiting a high energy physics lab for the first time – I’m convinced there isn’t really anything out there that could prepare you for the menagerie of sights you’ll see. Except, I hear, seeing another physics lab. I’ve been told they’re the same the world over, and seeing pictures of other labs, I have to agree. It personally took me a full three months of working here before I could go behind the fence (to where the cyclotron and all the experiments are) and not be overwhelmed by the wires, the machines you won’t see anywhere else, and the beamlines that bring beams (particles that have been sped to high speeds) everywhere around the lab.

Last week, I had two groups at the two different ends of the age spectrum. The first group was our lovely neighbours down the street at Tapestry, the seniors living community, and a group of Grade 4 students, who showed up in matching uniforms, nametags, and notebooks full of questions. What I love most is rhythm of the tours – it seems to always be the same, regardless of age level or background. It starts with tentative curiosity (“I’ve heard this place was here, and it seems interesting, but I have nooo idea what they do here”), which quickly moves to a growing ‘wow’ factor as we see images of the cyclotron, play with the dancing paperclips, and they begin to get a sense of scale of what we do here (Huge machines, looking at teeny tiny little particles and reactions).

Near the end of the tour, mostly with adults, if we stop by DRAGON (an experiment that recreates the reactions that happen inside of supernova) and I give people a moment to breathe, questions will inevitably come up with questions nearly religious in nature: what’s out there? How did this all come to be? Essentially, the big questions we all ask at one time or another. To me, that’s the greatest reward. When people leave energized, excited, maybe still not quite sure what we do here, but they know it’s cool, they know it’s physics, I know that they have spent their time thinking about questions and ideas they likely would not have been thinking about during a regular day. It’s a fantastic transition from tentativeness to full out excitement and curiosity, and I’m so glad I get to be part of sharing off this crazy, mind-bending place called TRIUMF.

Share

So You Shoot People in the Face…

Friday, May 13th, 2011

– By Nick Zacchia, Proton Therapy co-op student

“So you shoot people in the face with a cyclotron… AWESOME!” a friend of mine declared matter-of-factly. They had conveniently gleaned over the part where I explained the science behind proton therapy. Although they hadn’t quite got the intricacies of the science correct, they had understood the underlying message; that I have the coolest job in the world. I’m an engineering undergrad who packed up his stuff, got on a plane in Montreal and headed to Vancouver for a summer job at TRIUMF: Canada’s National Laboratory for Particle and Nuclear Physics. It’s only been about a week, but I already feel right at home.

I’m at a place where people value science for its own sake. Where no one is afraid to nerd-out. A place where dark matter matters. Where people are excited merely by the prospect of learning. Today I went to a lecture on baryons, tomorrow it is synchrotron physics, the day after it’s something I won’t even pretend to understand. Yet I’m encouraged to attend, to ask questions, to learn all that I can. Next week I’m being trained in radiation protection, not because it’s strictly necessary, but because it’s interesting and will provide insight into things like the situation in Japan. Plus, who doesn’t want to be trained on how to handle nuclear waste?

Really I feel that one of the greatest things about TRIUMF is that it is filled with people who never lost their childhood wonder. The curiosity that we were all born with but which somehow or other gets eroded by time, by life, by the monotony of everyday. But here people are free to let their curiosity get the best of them. It’s what drives the entire lab I think. People wondering about big questions and then going out and finding the answers.

My supervisor told me today that TRIUMF has to produce to stay viable and what TRIUMF produces he said, is scientific papers. Knowledge. Free for the taking. I find something very rewarding in that.

And if that wasn’t enough, TRIUMF is also helping to save people’s lives. Which brings me back to the proton therapy. The “shooting people in the face with a cyclotron”.  Without getting into the details of the procedure, which Wikipedia already does admirably, I’ll just say that using an 18 meter, 4000 ton magnet to create particles capable of destroying eye cancer while leaving the eye and (importantly) the brain intact is pretty sweet. During these treatments the entire facility becomes devoted to these few patients. Patients who, thanks to science, will see another day.

A few years back a friend and I tried to convince everyone to replace the word “cool” with the word “science” in their vocabularies (since they are basically synonymous). It never much caught on as a fad, but I can tell you that working at a particle accelerator is definitely SCIENCE.

Share

Design to Discovery

Friday, May 13th, 2011

By Lena Sitnikova, Outreach Assisistant

I’ll be honest. I’m a design student. When I applied, and later accepted the position of Outreach Assistant at TRIUMF, I envisioned that I would spend my summer quietly working at a small desk somewhere in the corner of some office, cranking out posters while largely oblivious to the physics around me. Well, the small desk was a fairly accurate assumption, the obliviousness – not so much. Having been at TRIUMF a grand total of 6 full workdays, I feel that I already know more than a first-year physics undergrad. It is probably just a feeling though.

Regardless, between the tour-guides, the co-ops and general atmosphere at TRIUMF, I have come to realize just how extensive the wealth of knowledge here is. And what’s even more, it’s all here because of the people. I’ve never really been one of the ‘physics crowd’, so it seemed to me that individuals that spent their days discussing nuclear fission and isotope decay couldn’t be like the “rest of us”. And I was right. Because they’re better! As I’ve discovered, people here at TRIUMF are normal individuals with kids, hobbies, etc., but what sets them apart is their passion for what they do.

Undoubtedly, it is this passion that makes them as easygoing and enthusiastic as I’ve discovered them to be.  And hopefully, after spending a summer here, some of it will rub off on me!

Share